| 1 | 2012-Feb-2 | provigil :PP nexium cbgx viagra 41926 () | tech. answer
id:tans4206 |
| 2 | 2012-Jan-29 | tramadol waogv levitra >:-(( () | tech. answer
id:tans4205 |
| 3 | 2012-Jan-29 | buy nexium international pharmacy otmvq colchicine %-P () | tech. answer
id:tans4204 |
| 4 | 2012-Jan-27 | colchicine hzam buy propecia at discount price ondk ultram =O () | tech. answer
id:tans4203 |
| 5 | 2012-Jan-26 | colchicine :-)) buy accutane 0812 tramadol 80310 () | tech. answer
id:tans4202 |
| 6 | 2012-Jan-26 | This is all so true! I think many of us, at one point or another, have gone through all of these phases. I, for one, have gone the last three. I think some of us go through a phase where we simply fear being overweight, as opposed to the “contemplation” phase where you actually are and need to take action. I never thought about the road toward wellness in phases like this, but it’s very true and a great indicator for those who want to get in shape. Thanks for posting!
health insurance rates () | tech. answer
id:tans4201 |
| 7 | 2012-Jan-18 | 7fojE2 wsnujogfvlpb () | tech. answer
id:tans4200 |
| 8 | 2012-Jan-18 | mse7Dr mhtpjbaoeifd () | tech. answer
id:tans4199 |
| 9 | 2012-Jan-18 | Nn6aXR psxzexheshak () | tech. answer
id:tans4198 |
| 10 | 2012-Jan-17 | I found myself ndodnig my noggin all the way through. () | tech. answer
id:tans4197 |
| 11 | 2012-Jan-17 | AFAICT you've covered all the bases with this awnser! () | tech. answer
id:tans4196 |
| 12 | 2012-Jan-17 | Thanks for writing such an easy-to-understand aritcle on this topic. () | tech. answer
id:tans4195 |
| 13 | 2011-Apr-27 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
new thread: Final results
The following are the final results from the test proposition to "Ban weapons."
Area: Planet
Proposition rejected
percentage of yes : 60% (required 65%)
percentage of voters : 55.56% (required 30%)
number of yes : 3
number of no : 2
number of voters : 5
number of voters required: 3
area active members at the time: 9
Thanks for allowing this test of the United People software. The software is really feature rich, and shows that a lot of thought and effort have gone into its design and implementation.
It worked. We were able to create an issue, offer propositions, discuss and rate those propositions, and then hold a ... continue (jkintree) | new thread
id:thr4194 |
| 14 | 2011-Apr-20 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
thread: Selected proposition
I suggest you look carefully at the charts. The number of raters choosing the same number of stars is placed upon the top of the bar in the chart. The one receiving 11 stars shows two rating of "3" and one rating for "5"; therefore, 2x3=6, and 6+5=11. (Ricardo) | thread answer
id:ans4193 |
| 15 | 2011-Apr-20 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
thread: Selected proposition
Oops, the rating system does not work as I first thought. There were three people who rated each of the two propositions in this issue. The "Ban weapons" proposition received one rating each of 3, 4, and 5 stars for a total of 12 stars. The "Converting to a global peace economy" proposition received two ratings of 3 stars and one rating of 1 star for a total of 11 stars. Interesting. (jkintree) | thread answer
id:ans4192 |
| 16 | 2011-Apr-20 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
thread: Selected proposition
Hmmnm, I thought the purpose of the "accepted suggestions by author" section of a proposition was to merge ideas into that proposition.
With respect to the rating of the propositions, two people rated the "Ban weapons" proposition with three stars, and one person rated the "Converting to a global peace economy" proposition with five stars. It looks like two ratings of three stars is a higher total rating than one rating of five stars.
If that is the way it works, then someone who wanted a certain proposition to become the selected proposition would give that proposition ... continue (jkintree) | thread answer
id:ans4191 |
| 17 | 2011-Apr-20 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
thread: Selected proposition
A proposition can only be edited during the discussion phase by the author following the comments or the suggestions submitted. If someone like to create a new proposition offering the synthesis of all the propositions it is also possible. NO one in the discussion phase proposed any editing or merging of particular propositions. Once the discussion phase is over we cannot edit propositions any more and participants are asked to rate them.
(Jarel) | thread answer
id:ans4190 |
| 18 | 2011-Apr-19 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Ban weapons
It is too late to accept changes in the proposition. It had to be done during the discussion phase. I cannot edit the proposition any more once we reach the rating phase. Now it is only a matter of accepting or rejecting the proposition while in the final vote phase. (Jarel) | sug. answer
id:resp4189 |
| 19 | 2011-Apr-19 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
new thread: Selected proposition
How did the "Ban weapons" proposition become the Selected proposition for the Final Vote on this issue? I missed that part of the process. Why was the original proposition "Converting to a global peace economy," or some synthesis of the two propositions, not selected for the Final vote? (jkintree) | new thread
id:thr4188 |
| 20 | 2011-Apr-19 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
Great ideas. I suppose thought is the first step to actualisation. Good on you. Love and peace, Sol (solmil) | prop. sug.
id:sug4187 |
| 21 | 2011-Apr-19 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Ban weapons
Hey, how's it going? I am entering in a comment with a word limit of 500, so I can add a suggestion here to modify the proposition? Do I wait to see any changes by the author before I click on Accept proposition or Reject? (Lupin) | prop. sug.
id:sug4186 |
| 22 | 2011-Apr-9 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
new thread: end discussion
I suggest we end the discussion and move forward with this issue (Jarel) | new thread
id:thr4185 |
| 23 | 2011-Mar-7 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
new thread: Quorums plus
One of the most extreme examples of democracy-by-the-few was the ratification of the Constitution of the United States by a vote of 30 Yes to 27 No in the state of New York on July 26, 1788. The population of New York state in 1790 was 340,120 people.
The need to express our collective rights and responsibilities as Sovereign citizens may be greatest at the global level. Since necessity is the mother of invention, perhaps United People will be realized first at the global level.
As you say in "Emerging from Illusion," Ricardo, "the exponential evolution ... continue (jkintree) | new thread
id:thr4184 |
| 24 | 2011-Mar-7 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
Ban weapons. In addition to other peaceful purposes to which the more than $1 trillion annual global military expenditures can be redirected, part of that money will be used to decommission, dismantle, and recycle existing weapons stockpiles.
Military weapons are distinguished from guns and other devices that are used for hunting.
(jkintree) | accepted sug.
id:acc4183 |
| 25 | 2011-Mar-7 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
Agreed, and accepted into the Proposition for the previous comment: any dollar spent on the military is a dollar wasted. (jkintree) | sug. answer
id:resp4182 |
| 26 | 2011-Mar-7 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
Any dollar spent for the military is a dollar wasted. (jkintree) | accepted sug.
id:acc4181 |
| 27 | 2011-Mar-6 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
I suggest we stop the military and ban weapons.
jkintree you will see that you are able to accept my suggestion and modify it so it becomes part of your proposition while keeping track of the author. (Jarel) | prop. sug.
id:sug4180 |
| 28 | 2011-Mar-6 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Ban weapons
when you think there has been enough discussion and you are satisfy with the propositions click end discussion (Jarel) | sug. answer
id:resp4179 |
| 29 | 2011-Mar-6 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Converting to a global peace economy
I think any dollar spent in military is a dollars wasted. The is my sugestion to jkintree for him to eventually respond or accept my suggestion (Jarel) | prop. sug.
id:sug4178 |
| 30 | 2011-Mar-6 | issue: Testing the upworldgov.org software
prop: Ban weapons
Thanks, Jarel. Having two Propositions for this issue makes it a much more interesting test.
So, we are in Discussion Phase. Propositions can be modified based on discussion, and so on, leading up to a rating of the Propositions. I'm still reading the documentation and help files to see how all of this works. (jkintree) | prop. sug.
id:sug4177 |
